Main Menu
Search

Advanced Search
or try google search
HM's Goodies and such
Become a Gold member!

Click Here for more Details about gold Memberships or click the Icon above to donate. Remember to include your Username with donations.
Who's Online
94 user(s) are online (35 user(s) are browsing Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 94

more...
advertisements
Your
AD
Here!
» Sign up Today!!
Report message:*
 

Re: poo

Subject: Re: poo
by nikgrid on 2005/8/7 17:19:05

I agree with Shade, I think Superman Reurns will be executed very well. I have great faith in Singer, mainly because he made the X-men movie good whereas I expected a piece of crap. He stuck to the main ideas of the X-men of racial inequality and the whole Malcolm X/Luther-King dynamic. Batman begins also stuck to the main idea of the character, unlike the Burton Batmans which were Gothic not Dark..there is a difference Tim.

A lot of people are saying that Warners are copying Marvels method of making films ie: serious superhero movies. That is not exactly correct, Superman the Movie was the first "Serious" Comic movie of which Superman Returns is a direct continuation of, and Marvel just used Warners original template.

As for the suit Sure the S could be bigger but it's still Superman, all Singer has done is pay homage to all the Superman suits through fleischer to Reeve. I mean hell I hate the way Jim Lee draws Supermans S-shield but it's still Superman.

And to help you warm to Rouths' suit here is a look at what might have been...


»
»
»