Thanks.
Funny thing about tea... I sometimes have to try it to know if I'll like it.
I am reminded of an older conversation we'd had about public domain characters. You'd said a lot of 'em were just too corny to use and I'd responded by saying there are no bad characters, just bad writers (though in comics, bad artists too). That's how I feel about characters and series too. In the original Doom Patrol run, I found the art a bit on the bland side but the stories were definitely weirder than the norm for superheroes so I enjoyed them because it was different. Now, I was a little slower to get started when Grant Morrison started writing. I liked Morrison as a writer but I was less keen on the art. While I agree with the theory that covers sell books (and comics and magazines) there can be a little backfire effect with comics when I see awesome cover art and less than that inside. That was the case with Morrison's Doom Patrol. It's not that Richard Case's interior art was bad, it was actually pretty good but way pale in comparison to the awesome Simon Bisley covers! Still once I bought a couple and read them, I was hooked enough to start tracking down back issues.
Now I haven't read any of the runs after that but as stated in a previous comment, I'd like to read John Byrne's run. That's because I know I've enjoyed when he wrote and drew Hulk, Alpha Flight, Fantastic Four and Superman. I know a good writer will write a good story and a good artist will draw it well. I have faith in their talents to elevate less interesting characters. Actually I can see where one might ague that Hulk, Alpha Flight, Fantastic Four and Superman actually are good characters
so perhaps Alan Moore's Watchmen, based on cheesy Charlton characters, or his Tom Strong based on a bland Doc Savage knockoff (Doc Strange; no relation) or MiracleMan, based on a weak Captain Marvel knockoff (MarvelMan) are prime examples! So don't be too quick to write things off when you see solid talent behind it.