Poster
| Thread
|
Dragondack |
Posted: 2007/4/25 19:35 Updated: 2007/4/25 19:35 |
The Great Eternal Dragon Joined: 2004/2/9 From: Edmonton,Alberta,Canada Posts: 11277 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Very cool,I like the way this came out!
|
|
|
BikerBot |
Posted: 2007/4/24 19:05 Updated: 2007/4/26 11:09 |
Mr. The Mighty Lord *Krackaboom!* Joined: 2004/1/13 From: The Good Earth Posts: 3277 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini This is a big improvement from the last one, Was! The string around her neck looks weird, like it goes around her hair, to. As for the "Physics" if invisibilty, you have a way to prove it right in front of you. Create a layer in Photoshop, fill it with a color. Set it's opacity to 50%. Do the same thing on another layer. Move them so the one on top only half covers the one on the bottom... 10 from me, BB
|
|
|
Wasmith |
Posted: 2007/4/24 8:15 Updated: 2007/4/24 8:15 |
Time Lord! Joined: 2004/8/27 From: Knobblers Gob Posts: 2002 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Dang... just noticed that I left out the label in the bikini bottom. Was going to put a label in. Dang dang dang.
|
|
|
JrMcDeath |
Posted: 2007/4/23 11:55 Updated: 2007/4/23 11:55 |
Kling on HM (WebMaster!) Joined: 2004/7/19 From: My Box Posts: 6993 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini S.A.M that is what I was going to say!!!! Too bad she had to be going invisible... she looks HOT! Well done WAS...well done!
|
|
|
SilverAgeMage |
Posted: 2007/4/21 19:19 Updated: 2007/4/21 19:19 |
superhero Joined: 2004/5/17 From: Pittsburgh area Posts: 452 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Actually,I'd prefer the bikini be invisible rather than Sue,but what the hey! Another nice one,Was! Good illusion.
|
|
|
Biohaz_Daddy |
Posted: 2007/4/21 17:14 Updated: 2007/4/21 17:14 |
deluded narcissist guru (Whateverator) Joined: 2004/7/6 From: Posts: 2723 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Quote: could have been a little slicker if you could see the arm that's behind her back... Quote: Now you know, that's an interesting comment. Not particularly, but it is one thing that I always notice about Sue Storm pics showing her invisible powers active. if you can see what's behind her, how come you can't see what's behind her. You seemed to have given it some thought up to including the bikini and as a result created a slick image. Taking it one step further equals one step slicker. Quote: Could (should?) you in fact be able to see her partially invisible arm behind her partially invisible side, or do the two partial invisible's cancel each other out? Why not, and um... maybe... Quote: We can see from the equation below:
That the degree of "out" light is roughly the same as the amount of "in" light. But we can also show that:
Which clearly indicates that there is still a matter of uncertainty. Actually, you forgot to carry the 3... but really the image is not lessened by not having a visible arm and or hand showing through. It's a fun and well thought out pic. Of course that's just my opinion. Quote: So, all in all, you should develop an immunity to iocaine powder, just to be on the safe side.
I am a quarter Sicilian... you know what they say...
|
|
|
MF |
Posted: 2007/4/21 13:38 Updated: 2007/4/21 13:38 |
Fanboy Extraordinaire Joined: 2005/3/27 From: MiddleOfNowhere, Ohio Posts: 2385 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Nice 3D effect with the swimsuit, Was.
|
|
|
Wasmith |
Posted: 2007/4/21 12:36 Updated: 2007/4/21 12:46 |
Time Lord! Joined: 2004/8/27 From: Knobblers Gob Posts: 2002 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Quote: could have been a little slicker if you could see the arm that's behind her back... Now you know, that's an interesting comment. Could (should?) you in fact be able to see her partially invisible arm behind her partially invisible side, or do the two partial invisible's cancel each other out? We can see from the equation below: That the degree of "out" light is roughly the same as the amount of "in" light. But we can also show that: Which clearly indicates that there is still a matter of uncertainty. So, all in all, you should develop an immunity to iocaine powder, just to be on the safe side.
|
|
|
co_04 |
Posted: 2007/4/21 11:39 Updated: 2007/4/21 11:39 |
Hellfire Club Member Joined: 2006/5/5 From: Posts: 831 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Nice tan.
|
|
|
MissVee |
Posted: 2007/4/21 11:19 Updated: 2007/4/21 11:19 |
Arch Nemesis Joined: 2003/10/20 From: Posts: 1447 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Afterthought: My only suggestion is to add (on the inside of the back of the bikini bottom) a tag which reads: "Was was here"...
|
|
|
BatMic |
Posted: 2007/4/21 10:08 Updated: 2007/4/21 10:08 |
Hellfire Club Member Joined: 2004/1/29 From: Scotland Posts: 408 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini nice job, it's almost a crime for her to be invisible though.
|
|
|
bhm1954 |
Posted: 2007/4/21 9:56 Updated: 2007/4/21 9:56 |
Hero to the stars Joined: 2005/7/18 From: Moses Lake, Washington Posts: 2852 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini This is pretty inventive. Nice job on this.
|
|
|
MissVee |
Posted: 2007/4/20 21:06 Updated: 2007/4/20 21:06 |
Arch Nemesis Joined: 2003/10/20 From: Posts: 1447 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini I thought that I had already "seen" all of the variations of Invisible Sues by now - but you've done it again Was! (I actually did post Sue in a white invisible bikini on a white background as a WIP...). It was very tasteful of you to erase her invisible nipples for the Pub(l)ic Gallery...
|
|
|
Biohaz_Daddy |
Posted: 2007/4/20 14:58 Updated: 2007/4/20 14:58 |
deluded narcissist guru (Whateverator) Joined: 2004/7/6 From: Posts: 2723 |
Re: Sue's New Bikini Pretty Slick Was man... could have been a little slicker if you could see the arm that's behind her back...
|
|
|